Results
Properties you can open, and one documented case
No invented testimonials and no unsourced numbers. Named properties you can open right now, one documented institutional case, and the output of a real audit with the client's name removed.
The proof
I run SEO for some of the largest institutions in the Middle East.
These are not anonymous client logos. They are properties you can open right now, run any tool you trust against, and judge for yourself.
- 11
- properties
- Every property in the group, in two languages.
- 5,000+
- keywords
- Held stable across them, not a spike one month and a fall the next.
- 2,000+
- AI brand mentions
- Tracked, analysed, and turned into execution priorities.
- 25%
- faster on mobile
- After crawl, schema and Core Web Vitals remediation.
- al-sharq.com
- al-arab.com
Institutional client
A large bilingual institutional site nobody had diagnosed before
- 2
- languages audited together, not one translated
- 1
- one document instead of scattered reports
- 0
- new tools their team needed to execute it
The situation
An institutional client with a large bilingual site suspected its search presence did not match its real size, without knowing the specific reason. There was no prior diagnosis to build on.
The work
A full technical site audit, crawl and indexation analysis, a review of structure and language versions, and a content assessment measured against what the audience actually searches for, in Arabic and English alike.
The outcome
The organisation walked away with a single document ranked by impact against effort, with each item naming who would carry it out. Their own internal technical team executed it without coming back to me and without buying a single tool. Everything it surfaced had been there all along, invisible to everyone inside, which is the normal state of most organisations, not the exception.
I do not publish the client’s name or screenshots from the report without written permission, and that permission is the one thing I do not have yet. That is why the next section shows the output of a real audit with the client's name removed, for you to judge yourself.
From the output
What the output of a real audit looks like
Real scores from an audit that actually ran, carrying no domain and no logo, which is why they can be shown without a client's permission. Below them, what one row of the technical workbook looks like.
From a real audit · client name removed
This is a real website audit scorecard, not a mockup
Category scores from an audit that actually ran, each out of a hundred, weakest first. The numbers are real and carry no domain or logo, which is why they can be shown without a client’s permission.
78findings
- Critical16
- Warning42
- Info20
Your report carries this same scorecard for your own site: a score and a maturity level for each of the 24 categories that apply to you, with the reason behind every score and what raises it.
Severity
Critical
Finding
Your page copy is absent from the HTML your server sends
What it means for the business
AI crawlers do not wait for JavaScript. What is not in the first response never gets read, so it never gets cited, and no ranking report will show you that.
Who does it, and how long
Your developer: switch the public templates to server rendering. Roughly half a day.
The retest that proves it fixed
View the page source with JavaScript off: the copy must be there in full.
Instead of waiting for proof
The shortest way to verify me is to try me on your own site
I am not asking you to believe a case study whose subject you cannot ask. The audit is its own sample: pay once, and read what I wrote about your specific site, not someone else's.
Exactly what the audit coversThe Digital Presence Audit
249USD
- The written report, and the technical workbook (Excel, about 50 sheets)
- Your site up to 200 pages, crawled in a real browser
- Google, Bing, Yahoo and YouTube, plus ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity
- Up to three competitors you name, run through the same checks
- A 12-month roadmap, ordered by impact against effort
Pay by bank transfer, or by a card link I send you on WhatsApp. Price excludes VAT where applicable.
Verify it yourself
Three ways to judge me, none of which cost you anything
Do not take my word for it. Any one of these three gives you evidence you can judge for yourself within minutes.
- 01
Audit this very site
Run any auditing tool you trust against the exact page you are reading right now. A slow, badly built site from someone selling SEO exposes them faster than any testimonial could.
- 02
Review how AI visibility is measured
AI answers change and are not a fixed ranking table. In the report, I document the buyer questions relevant to your business, the engines used, the date of measurement, and the sources that appeared. That is reviewable measurement, not a promise that any name will appear in a particular answer.
- 03
Ask me about one specific problem
Write to me on WhatsApp or through the contact page and ask about one specific problem on your site or in your online presence. Judge whether the answer is actually useful, then decide.
Write to me
Ask for the evidence that would convince you
Write and tell me what you would need to see to decide: real audit output with the client's name removed, or an answer about one specific problem on your own site. I will send whatever I can.